Showing posts with label Licensing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Licensing. Show all posts

Thursday, December 18, 2014

Leoplod’s Story


Novex Communications a leading satellite channel distribution company filed a case[1] against Leopold Café, one of the oldest and most famous café of Bombay for exploitation of copyrighted work principally owned by Yashraj Films Pvt. Ltd. and Shemaroo Entertainment Limited.
The main question for determination in this case was whether Novex Communication is entitled to grant licence on the behalf of owners of copyright in various works.
Section 30 of the Copyright Act, 1957 provides that owner of copyright and his duly authorized agent may grant any interest by licence in writing. It further prohibits any person or association of persons from carrying on business of granting or issuing licences in respect of any work in which copyright subsists only exception is Copyright Societies Registered under Chapter VII of the Act.
The court held that for a valid licence by an agent under Copyright Act factum of agency must be disclosed so that licensee knows that it has valid licence from the owner. The minute principle is undisclosed and licence is granted in the agent’s name, the prohibition in Section 33 comes into play.
Honourable High Court observed that licences issued by Novex did not indicate that it is acting as agent for the right holders. Further the manner in which Novex is conducting its operation does not indicate that it is acting as agent for owners of copyright, thus is in direct contravention of Section 33(1).
The court in this case harmoniously interpreted Section 30 & 33 and clarified that the prohibition under Section 33 does not apply to a case where an individual acts in his individual capacity, which includes acting through an agent but only requirement is to disclose the fact of agency.
 __ Gajendra Khichi


[1] M/s. Leopold Café & Stores & Anr v/s Novex Communications Private Ltd. Suit (603of 2014) Bombay HC, decided on 17/7/2014

Saturday, November 1, 2014

Orphan Works

Copyright protected work for which the rights holder(s) is/are positively indeterminate and cannot be contacted, is said to be an Orphan Work. Even when the author is known, but there is lack of sufficient details to contact him or her, the work falls into this domain. A copyright holder’s sudden demise might also lead to the work slipping into the category of Orphan Works, when the inheritance cannot be established.

The fact that the owner of the copyrighted work cannot be reached makes it very difficult to obtain his permission for the use of the work, mere digitization becomes impossible. The use can only be warranted by Fair Use Exceptions.

The respective Governments have taken steps towards extending the accessibility of these works to the general public for these works to maintain their successful circulation and some have also taken steps to guarantee the payment of royalties for use of such works.

The latest news in this regard, is the UK IPO’s licensing scheme for Orphan Works. The IPO intends to maintain a register of works which can be licensed out to Applicants upon payment of royalties. The register will also enable the authors to check if any of their works have been labeled as Orphan Works under the system. The IPO also retains the power to deny the Applicants licenses where the proposed use is deemed to be inappropriate, or on any other reasonable ground.


The EU rules, in place, have already allowed the libraries, museums and universities, among other institutions, to digitize “Orphaned Works” from their respective collections, only after a diligent search has been carried out for determining the owners of the works. It is only time which shall determine the success of the scheme which the UK IPO has intended to move ahead with, and similar frameworks being adopted by other IP regimes across the globe. 


- Bagmisikha Puhan

Sunday, July 29, 2012

Licensing Agreement

A License is a contractual right that gives someone permission to do a certain activity or to use certain property that is owned by someone else. In an Intellectual property license, one company grants permission to another to use its Intellectual property, to which it has exclusive rights.
A License allows an intellectual property rights holder (the licensor) to create a business from an invention or creative work by charging a user (the licensee) for product use. It also helps to control, manage and protect the intellectual property.
In Intellectual property, Licensing agreement is a written contract under which the owner of a copyright, know how, patent, service mark, trademark, or other intellectual property, allows a licensee to use, make, or sell copies of the original. Such agreements usually limit the scope or field of the licensee, and specify whether the license is exclusive or non-exclusive, and whether the licensee will pay royalties or some other consideration in exchange. While licensing agreements are mainly used in commercialization of a technology, they are also used by franchisers to promote sales of goods and services.
A variety of such licensing agreements are available, which may be broadly categorized as follows:
·         Technology licensing agreement: By a technology licensing agreement the licensor authorizes the licensee to use the technology under certain agreed terms and conditions. It is, therefore, a contract freely entered into between two parties and contains terms and conditions so agreed. Therefore, if any Small and medium size enterprises (SME) is interested in improving the quality of its product or manufacturing a new product by using the rights owned by others in the form of a patent, utility model, or know how protected by a trade secret then acquiring such rights through a licensing agreement is the right solution.
·         Trademark licensing and franchising agreement: A trademark license is an arrangement by which the licensor consents to the use of its trademark by the licensee on agreed terms and conditions. A franchising agreement is granted by the franchisor to the franchisee to use its trademark and the franchised system. Therefore, if any SME is interested in marketing the product or service, and the brand (trademark) of that product, is owned by others or, entering and expanding the existing market for the product or service for which the SME owns the right conferred by a trademark then considering a trademark license or a franchise agreement is the right solution.
·         Copyright license agreements: The Copyright License Agreement is an agreement between the owner of the copyright in any existing work or the prospective owner of the copyright and the company or individual in any future work in writing to another person for a limited time. This license should not be mistaken with an assignment. Therefore, if any SME is interested in manufacturing, distributing or marketing the results of the literary and artistic efforts of creators or, entering a market or expanding or extending the existing market for the literary and artistic efforts of the enterprise, then considering a copyright license agreement is the right solution.
However, in practice, all or some of these agreements often form part of one single contract, since, it involves not only the intellectual property rights but many other rights also.
Under the Trademark Act 1999, the assignability and transmissibility of trademark are covered from Section 37 to Section 45.Section 37 of the said Act deals with the power of the registered proprietor to assign the trademark; and the assignability and transmissibility of registered and unregistered trademark whether with or without the goodwill of the business concerned is covered under Section 38 and Section 39 of the Act respectively. The registration of the assignment comes under the purview of Section 45 of the said Act.
In International context, a formal licensing agreement is possible only if the intellectual property right that is wish to license is also protected in the other country or countries, and, if the intellectual property is not protected in such other country or countries then the property would not be license and also there would be no legal right to put any restriction on its use by anyone else.